Sunday, July 31, 2022

Politicization reaches the Hospital Board Race

Note; Tom Walker, longtime Sarasota advocate for clean waters and Manasota 88, shared this piece from the Washington Post.

Information from the Washington Post yesterday about our local Sarasota hospital board races. At the end I've appended my original email with recommendations. Apologies to those of you who live outside Sarasota County, but this is a nationwide phenomenon that deserves attention.   


Sarasota Memorial Hospital (SMH)

Conservatives skeptical of coronavirus vaccines battle to lead a hospital

The battle for control of one of Florida’s largest public health systems has turned political

Tim Craig July 30, 2022

SARASOTA, Fla — When his blood oxygen dropped to what he described as a critically low level in September, Victor Rohe knew he had “a bad case of covid.”

But like growing numbers of conservatives here in southwest Florida, Rohe didn’t trust the doctors at Sarasota Memorial Hospital to treat him, even though it’s part of one of the state’s largest and highest ranked medical systems.

Rohe, a longtime Republican activist and self-described strict “constitutionalist,” instead rented his own oxygen unit and hooked it up at home. For the next several days, Rohe battled his coronavirus infection in his living room, relying on medical advice from friends and family members.

“If I went to the hospital, I believed I would die,” said Rohe, pointing to online videos and conspiracy theories he watched raising questions about the care some coronavirus patients received at the hospital.

Now a year later, Rohe is part of a slate of four conservative candidates trying to take over control of the board that oversees Sarasota’s flagship public hospital, highlighting how once-obscure offices are emerging as a new front in the political and societal battles that have intensified across the country since the start of the pandemic in 2020.

Although the contenders are considered underdogs to win on Aug. 23, health policy experts say the campaign is a troubling sign of how ideological divisions are spilling into the world of medical care as fights over abortion, the coronavirus and vaccines increasingly fall across party lines — alarming doctors, hospital administrators and medical experts.

“All you need to do is look at how [school boards] have now become very political … and how boards of education have ignored the science of education,” said Michele Issel, a public health professor emeritus at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. “There’s this new disregard for the professional training that medical people have, and a disregard for the science of what is best for the population.”

The Sarasota candidates, at least three of whom are skeptical of coronavirus vaccine mandates, are rallying behind the theme of “medical freedom.” The term is increasingly being utilized by the conservative movement nationwide and hits a belief that patients aren’t given enough control over their medical care. Proponents point to vaccine mandates and difficulty accessing unproven coronavirus treatments like Ivermectin that were touted by politicians but rejected by physicians.

“All 4 of us are devoted Christians, conservatives and patriots who deserve to make the [Sarasota Memorial Hospital] system stronger, more accountable with greater transparency,” one of the candidates, Joseph S. Chirillo, a retired physician, wrote in a social media post.

Several Florida-based conservative or far-right organization are supporting Rohe and his running mates in their bid to join the nine-member Sarasota hospital board.

Tamra Farah, senior director of MomForce, the education-focused branch of Moms for America, a group pushing for conservative women to become more engaged in the political process, said campaigns for low-profile positions demonstrate those on the right have “woken up.” Issues involving medical care also increasingly galvanize conservatives to the polls, Farah said, amid their growing distrust of the health care establishment.

“No one should ever feel threatened by one group of doctors’ thoughts versus another group of doctors,” Farah said. “Everyone should have their debates. Everyone should have all the information available. And people should be able to decide for themselves.”

In Sarasota, the county hospital has long been a source of pride while also serving as a magnet drawing both retirees and doctors and nurses to the region. U.S. News and World Report recently named Sarasota Memorial Hospital as the sixth best hospital in Florida, and the top hospital in the broader Tampa Bay region.

Moderate and left-leaning residents now worry that the hospital’s prized reputation could be shattered if the current board is ousted in favor of more conservative candidates, who have largely still have not explained how they would wield their new powers.

“I am not sure what they are looking to prove, because we have a phenomenal hospital system,” said Teri A Hansen, president and CEO of the Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation, a Sarasota-based charity that oversees a $636 million endowment. “I would like to think that the people running just want to see it grow and be a winner, but I suspect that is not why they are running.”

As a taxpayer funded public hospital, Sarasota Memorial Hospital also operates as one of the region’s safety net hospitals. Nationwide, 951 of the nation’s 6,093 hospitals are affiliated with a state or local government, according to the American Hospital Association. In Florida, those public hospitals can either have elected or appointed boards of directors.

Sarasota’s elected board members — who represent districts but are elected by voters countywide — hold staggered four-year terms. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board members hire the CEO, provide strategic guidance, oversee the system’s $1.3 billion annual budget, and have the power to assess a property tax to raise money for hospital projects.

The current board members up for reelection this year, all of whom are also Republicans, appear stunned to now face a challenge from the more conservative wing of their party. Many have extensive backgrounds in medicine or business, and find themselves in the middle of a battle that could also help determine whether relatively moderate GOP candidates can continue to fend off more conservative factions.

Darryl W. Henry has served on the hospital board since 2008 and is facing a challenge from Patricia Maraia, a nurse running with the slate of conservative candidates.

Before retiring in Sarasota in 2006, Henry worked for the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon in Washington, serving as the director of the tech-focused Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration program. In the 1980s, Henry also served as chief engineer of the U.S. military’s “Milnet,” which he described as a forerunner of the internet.

In an interview, Henry said he is not sure why Maraia decided to challenge him, although he recalls how she would show up at board meetings as “controversial noise” during discussions about the hospital’s coronavirus and vaccination policies.

“The people running will probably regret if they won this position,” Henry said. “It is hard. It is time demanding and it requires deep intellectual thought and requires you gaining knowledge of the entire medical process, and entire medical financial process.”

Maraia did not return phone calls seeking comment. On her campaign website, Maraia describes herself as a “conservative who is committed to serving her community” by advocating for “patient’s rights” and the “rights of the medical profession to practice medicine with freedom.”

Another incumbent GOP board member, Joseph J. DeVirgilio, Jr., is president of a consulting company and a former utility executive who also previously served on a hospital board in Upstate New York. DeVirgilio is being challenged by Bridgette Fiorucci, a nurse at Sarasota Memorial Hospital who helped organize opposition to the hospital’s vaccine mandate policies, and one other GOP candidate.

Fiorucci did not respond to telephone and written requests for comment. In January, Fiorucci posted a photograph on Facebook of herself standing beside Robert Malone, a controversial activist who has spread discredited information about coronavirus vaccines.

“Over the last 3 years, we have seen our freedom slowly eroding,” Fiorucci wrote on her campaign website. “Decisions have been made in the medical profession that have ruled over a patients’ autonomy … I want to make sure you have ALL medical options available.”

DeVirgilio, however, said he believes Sarasota voters will continue to support him, noting his experience and the current board’s accomplishments, including overseeing the recent construction of a 100-bed hospital and opening a new cancer care center

“As an individual schooled in engineering,” DeVirgilio added, “I support the expansion of science-based health care initiatives for improved care for my Sarasota neighbors.”

Located about an hour south of Tampa, Sarasota County is home to about 450,000 residents who live among some of the nation’s top-ranked beaches and historic arts venues. Although the county has been a relative stronghold for Republicans for generations, voters here largely tended to align with the moderate, business-oriented wing of the party.

But over the past 2½ years, Sarasota has been an epicenter of some of Florida’s nastiest brawls over what policies should be implemented to keep residents safe during the pandemic.

Initially, the county school board voted to maintain a mask mandate for students, even though Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and GOP legislators barred school districts from implementing one.

Floridians give DeSantis points for his covid stance. Will it hold?

The policy enraged some parents, leading to months of tense school board meetings. Meanwhile, the public feud over the pandemic increasingly centered around covid patient care at Sarasota Memorial Hospital, even though the facility has consistently earned A ratings for patient safety. Rohe said one incident in particular last summer spurred the conservative challengers’ bids for the board.

In August, Sarasota County resident Stephen Guffanti, a former emergency room physician and outspoken conservative activist, was admitted to Sarasota Memorial Hospital for coronavirus treatment. Guffanti, who was skeptical he really was infected with the virus, was placed in a hospital room with another coronavirus patient. Within days, Guffanti said in an interview, both he and his roommate develop pneumonia — a complication of the virus.

As his roommate’s condition deteriorated, Guffanti said he became worried the man was not receiving quality care and became his “patient advocate.” He said he notified nurses and the on-call doctor that his roommate was getting worse — and accused them of not taking his concerns seriously. After raising his concerns, Guffanti said he was separated from the man and placed in a room by himself. Later, he signed a document to get out of the hospital, even though it was against medical advice. The patient he’d expressed concern about died a few days later, he said.

Kim Savage, a hospital spokeswoman, declined to comment on Guffanti’s allegations, citing privacy laws. But Savage said hospital employees “worked with dedication and diligence throughout this pandemic.” She added “unsubstantiated, untrue and often politically motivated accusations” do “a grave disservice to patients, caregivers and the community.”

But after he was released from the hospital, Guffanti produced viral videos that documented his alleged experience in the hospital and claiming that the hospital had become “a jail” — fueling conspiracy theories that health institutions were trying to inflate coronavirus numbers. The videos quickly circulated among conservative and anti-vaccine groups, leading to demonstrations outside the hospital.

About a month ago, Guffanti decided to press his grievance with the hospital even further by recruiting the slate of candidates to run for the health system’s board, personally reaching out to Rohe, Fiorucci, Maraia and Chirillo to launch their campaigns under the banner of “medical freedom.”

“The biggest problem, and it’s not just here, it’s all around the country, is the interruption of the doctor-patient relationship,” said Rohe, adding Guffanti’s experience at the hospital is one reason he decided to self-treat his own coronavirus symptoms. “If you went to a hospital. Would you want your medical decisions made a bureaucratic? Or by your doctor? … The culture of the hospital has changed.”

‘All we think about is the patients’

Shortly after Rohe and his running mates announced their candidacy, a coalition of conservative political groups began rallying in support, often linking the slate with a simultaneous effort by the right to win a majority on the Sarasota County School board.

In addition to Sarasota Moms for America, the slate has been endorsed by Sarasota Watchdogs, a far-right group whose leaders have been involved in several testy political fights in the county. Rohe said the slate is also being supported activists affiliated with Defend Florida, a group pushing to rewrite state elections laws to limit mail-in ballots.

“Conservatives just want to live our lives, do our own thing, and just be left alone,” said Victor G. Mellor, a local business executive who is supporting the slate. “That didn’t happen [during covid] … so everyone now understands you have to start sacrificing, wake up and get involved.”

Dr. Matthew N. Goldenberg, an associate professor of psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine, said he’s not surprised the politicization of medicine is now presenting itself in highly localized elections.

“Partisanship is creeping more and more, and in fact sprinting, into all facets of society,” said Goldenberg, who studies political trends in health care. “And one of the things that people can do to hopefully protect themselves is just be aware of that phenomena.”

Issel, the University of North Carolina professor, said a conservative takeover Sarasota’s hospital board could have a variety of implications.

With the board having the authority to raise Sarasota County property taxes, Issel said new board members could use that to drain hospital revenue. If new board members tried to enact policies that limited the administration of vaccinations, for example, Issel said that could result in conflict with major insurance companies.

“Would they pick a new CEO that is aligned with their perspective?” Issel asked. “And how would the new policies of the CEO trickle down?”

Thomas R. Oliver, professor of Population Health Sciences at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, said he worries politicization of health care could eventually filter into the boards of larger, statewide hospital systems.

Some public hospital networks, such as the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, have boards of directors appointed by governors. And in recent months, some Republican officials have appointed vaccine skeptics to state health care boards or commissions.

“If you suddenly get new boards of government health care systems, you could really impact things significantly and cause a lot of reconsidering of what are our services? Who has a say?” Oliver said.

Dr. James Fiorica, the chief medical officer of the Sarasota Memorial Health Care System, said he doubts the makeup of the board would influence how medical care is offered. Instead, Fiorica said the bigger risk is that a new board could “slow down projects.”

“You certainly don’t want to rock the boat of a good system that is making good progress,” he said.

Social media posts made by one of the conservative candidates, Chirillo, provide some insight into his views. On Facebook, Chirillo, the retired doctor, has downplayed the ongoing spread of the monkeypox virus, mocked the effectiveness of vaccines, and questioned whether the term “assault weapon” should be used to describe such weapons.

Rohe, a former New York City police officer who also previously worked in the financial services industry, also expressed controversial views about the coronavirus vaccine.

“Calling it a vaccination is a joke,” Rohe said. “All it really is is a government-mandated shot to inoculate people to the fact that the government owns your body, and you do not.”

Still, Rohe stressed, if elected he and the rest of his slate will stay focused on bolstering oversight over hospital management, saying they are merely trying to create a hospital where residents feel comfortable talking to their doctors about a variety of treatment options when they need medical care.

“All we think about is the patients,” Rohe said.

=====

Note from Tom Walker:

Like me, many of you in Sarasota are starting to fill out your Vote by Mail ballots. I noticed that there were four races for the hospital board, all with unfamiliar names. So I asked some knowledgeable friends and came up with a recommendation for each of those races.

  • Hospital Board Central District Seat 2 -   Thomas Dart 
  • Hospital Board Northern District Seat 1 - Brad Baker
  • Hospital Board Southern District Seat 1 - Darryl Henry
  • Hospital Board Southern District Seat 2 - Gregory Carter

The above choices are incumbents and although republican will help the board continue to function in a non-political manner. I recommend not voting for any of those at this website: https://healthfreedomsrq.com

And of course please be sure to vote for these three for the school board:

  • School Board District 1 - Dawnyelle Singleton (and definitely not for "Moms for Liberty" Ziegler)
  • School Board District 4 - Lauren Kurnov
  • School Board District 5 - Nora Cietek 

If you've not yet received your ballot in the mail, you can see what your actual ballot will look like at https://www.sarasotavotes.gov/Election-Information/Sample-Ballots.

In Manatee County go to https://www.votemanatee.com/Election-Information/Sample-Ballots.

Much more information is at ballotpedia.org, vote411.org, and sarasotadems.org


Sunday, July 17, 2022

Alert: Help Stop the destruction of rural Sarasota - Meeting July 21

                   


DON'T LET DEVELOPMENT PAVE OVER OUR RURAL LANDS


NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION MEETING JULY 21st at 7pm in person at Bethel Mennonite Church or Via Zoom

Paving Pat Neal has set his bulldozer sights on rural Sarasota County. He wants to destroy over 4,000 rural acres with 5,000 dwelling units that will add 47,000 daily vehicle trips to our roadways. His comprehensive plan amendment (CPA 2022-B) will sprawl from University Parkway to Fruitville Road and from Cowpen Lane east for approximately 3.1 miles (ending east of the S-curve). This proposal is in addition to Hi Hat (already approved) and increases the density approved for Lake Park Estates (the destruction you see from Fruitville east of Cowpen Lane).

Please come at 7pm on July 21st to learn more about how we are fighting this proposed development.

JOIN US IN PERSON at Bethel Mennonite Church, 2985 Bethel Lane (on north side of Fruitville) 

 OR

JOIN US VIA ZOOM go to the website: SarasotaCountry.net for more information and to register for Zoom
                              




Also on July 21st:

Becky Ayech and the Miakka Community Club are working against Paving Pat's development by asking the Planning Commission to require the developers to hold another Neighborhood Workshop with the community. The workshop held on April 7, 2022 was totally inadequate and did not meet the County's requirements. We all need your support with emails and people showing up at the Planning Commission Meeting at 5 pm on July 21st. If you aren't on Becky's email list and didn't get her Action Alert, reach out to her at miakka1945@gmail.com and let her know you want to help.

(Then you can join our Neighborhood Action Meeting on your way back home or catch us via Zoom.)

If you can't make the meeting and want more information and to sign up for our emails, go to SarasotaCountry.net

See you at the Neighborhood Action Meeting! 

Susan Schoettle
President
Keep the Country, Inc.


Monday, July 11, 2022

Webinar July 25: The Fish Farm Threat to the Gulf

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 5, 2022
Contact: Christian Wagley   850.687.9968    christian@healthygulf.org

****MEDIA ADVISORY****

Offshore fish farms threaten Gulf of Mexico

The Federal government is proposing multiple offshore fish farms in the Gulf of Mexico, threatening the health of Gulf waters and stocks of wild fish. Join us as we learn about these proposed farms, their specific locations off Florida, Louisiana and Texas, and work being done to keep them from harming Gulf waters and marine life.

Our guests include James Mitchell, legislative director, Don’t Cage Our Oceans; Christian Wagley, coastal organizer, Healthy Gulf; Neal Schleifer, Siesta Key, FL and Andrianna Natsoulas, campaign director, Don’t Cage Our Oceans. Don’t Cage Our Oceans is a coalition of 14 nonprofit organizations working to stop offshore fish farming while uplifting values-based sea-food systems led by local communities.

More information on this event is available on the Healthy Gulf website and Facebook page.

Healthy Gulf is a nonprofit organization that works to protect and restore the Gulf of Mexico and the people and communities along its shores. For more information or questions please contact Florida – Alabama Coastal Organizer Christian Wagley: christian@healthygulf.org or (850) 687-9968.

=====

See Glenn Compton for more:

Sunday, July 10, 2022

Sarasota 7th in new home construction - without accountability

Developers Pat Neal, Rex Jensen and others claim they're just getting started here, when home builders have already clear-cut tens of thousands of acres of habitat, agricultural lands and open space in the last few years alone. 

Skye Ranch townhomes under construction, Clark Road

This Board of County Commissioners serves as a rubber stamp for their efforts, which has released without accountability, many thousands of tons of CO2 and methane into the atmosphere, replaced the function and value of the land, the carbon sink and storm water attenuation properties of the land with impervious surface. 


Research shows the short and long term effects of such irresponsible actions to be: 

  • Dramatic increases in the heat island effect. 
  • Dramatic increases in toxic pollution in storm water runoff into impacted water bodies and the Gulf of Mexico. 
  • Increased destruction of wildlife habitats and wetlands, exacerbating the extinction crisis. 
  • Extreme increases in releases of methane and CO2, contributing to the climate change crisis. 

More than 25,000 homes approved in one area of NE Sarasota Cty

 

North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton

  • New per 1,000 existing 2021: 36.2
  • New per 1,000 existing 2019: 23.6
  • Total new units authorized 2021: 15,924
  • Total new units authorized 2019: 10,009
  • Percentage change in housing units authorized 2019–2021: 59.1%
  • Median home price: $471,267

2022 cost to build a house



United States

  • New per 1,000 existing 2021: 12.
  • Recent FDH: No swim advisory issued for Palma Sola South. 


Gayle Reynolds,
Conservation Chair,
M/S Sierra Club


Ed's note: The text of Reynold's message is verbatim. Images were added by the editor.

Proposed New Rules for Charter Schools: Sufficient or No?

This was posted to the Sarasota Voices list. It might help structure some discussion of Charter School education in Sarasota as the School Board elections proceed.


Given the mixed bag of charter school 'partnerships' clamoring for our tax money and fighting regulation at every level, these Federal Guidelines might serve to guide our local representatives in raising the bar for every such 'partnership' where the funding comes from taxpayers and the profits accrue to the investor classes. 

This week the US Department of Education released much-anticipated updates to rules for the Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter School Programs (CSP) – the Grants to State Entities and the Grants to Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools programs.

This is the first update to the rules since 1994 and will apply to grant applicants for this year and subsequent years. Proposed rules were released in April followed by a comment period. A total of 26,580 comments were received of which 5,770 were unique. Most were duplicates from letter-writing campaigns. According to the department, “the majority [of comments] expressed general support for the regulations and the priorities.”

The first section of the new rules lists the main points raised in the public comments and what (if any) change was made in the rules in response.

According to the department, the rules affirm its commitment to assuring access to high-quality education for all students by:

  • “Ensuring that all students – with a focus on underserved students – have access to a high-quality public education, whether in a charter school, a magnet school, a community school, or other type of public school.
  • Supporting high-quality charter schools and fulfilling our responsibility to be good stewards of federal funds. This means ensuring that recipients of taxpayer dollars across all Department discretionary and formula grant programs – including these programs – are subject to strong fiscal transparency, oversight, and accountability.
  • Recognizing the important role the federal government can play in supporting state and local efforts to increase student diversity across and within our nation’s public school system. We are at our strongest as a nation when we embrace the rich diversity across our country. Federal resources should not be used to increase racial or socioeconomic segregation and isolation.”

These goals are accomplished through several key provisions of the rules.

Limitations on applications from for-profit entities and more transparency requirements. 

  • Applicants must ensure that the for-profit management company “does not exercise full or substantial control over the charter school.” This requirement bars charter schools operated by for-profit companies from obtaining CSP funds. There are numerous such charter schools in NC.
  • Applicants who plan to contract with a for-profit management company must provide extensive information about the contract, leadership personnel, real estate, etc. and the charter school must not share legal, accounting, or auditing services with the for-profit.

Greater transparency and accountability for charter schools, state entities, and charter management operators that apply for grants.

  • Charter school grantees must hold a public hearing on proposed or expanded charter school plans. The schools are obligated to reach out to the community to encourage and provide a summary as part of the obligation.
  • Information about potential costs for prospective parents must be clearly published including fees, uniform requirements, disciplinary practices, transportation plans, and whether the school participates in the national free/reduced-price lunch program.
  • Schools must publish for-profit management contracts, names of awardee schools and their peer-reviewed applications as well as descriptions of the review process. (NC already publishes grant proposals)
  • There are new restrictions on schools spending implementation funds for planning year activities prior to the charter school being approved and securing a facility.

Submission of a needs analysis that includes

  • Evidence of community desire for the school.
  • Documentation of the school’s enrollment projections and how they were determined.
  • A demographic analysis of the district and the proposed school.
  • The projected impact on racial and socioeconomic diversity with assurances that the school will not increase racial segregation and isolation in the local school district from which the charter school would draw its students. 
  • Assurance and steps taken to ensure that the school will not negatively affect district desegregation efforts.

These new rules for future CSP grantees are common-sense ways to assure the public that taxpayer dollars are being spent to benefit our students' education and not to enrich operators or increase segregation.

For example, since 2001, 930 CSP-funded charter schools and proposed charter schools (approximately 14.5 percent) either never opened or closed prior to the end of the grant period.

These charter school closures and failures to open cost more than $174 million in federal resources provided through CSP.

The new rules that require more advance planning, evidence of need, and limits on spending without authorization all bolster the likelihood of a charter's ultimate success.

These new rules are an important first step in making sure that taxpayer dollars are not spent on schools that

  • never open or
  • open and close quickly, 
  • foster segregation, or
  • simply line the pockets of for-profit operators. 

Increased transparency will shine a light on the positive and negative aspects of the charter school programs and will hopefully lead to more improvements in the future.